In Murthy v. Missouri the Court refused to consider the merits of a free-speech case because the plaintiffs allegedly lacked “standing,” but as the dissent argues, all the elements for standing were present, and the Court most certainly should have ruled on the merits. Tracy Beanz, who’s followed the case closely, joins us.
Sponsors
If you’re a listener of the Tom Woods Show, chances are you have some gold. But if you’re just sitting on it, you’re leaving money on the table. At Monetary Metals your gold earns interest that compounds over time. I’ve been using it for a while now, and the great Jeff Deist, formerly of the Mises Institute, just joined their team. Start your account (click here)
Getting clobbered by your competitors? Invisible in the search engines? Your leads at a trickle — or nonexistent? Persist SEO can turn that all around for your business. Check them out at ineedseo.help.
Guest’s Website
Guest’s Twitter
Thread Discussed
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1805998724331549148
Tom’s New Book!
Get Tom’s new book Diary of a Psychosis: How Public Health Disgraced Itself During COVID Mania, plus his free bonuses, at DiaryOfCovid.com