Thomas E. Woods, Jr., is the New York Times bestselling author of 11 books, including The Politically Incorrect Guide to American History and Meltdown (on the financial crisis). A senior fellow of the Ludwig von Mises Institute, Woods has appeared on MSNBC, CNBC, FOX News, FOX Business, C-SPAN, Bloomberg Television, and hundreds of radio programs... (Read More)

The Tom Woods App

Commissar of the Week?

29th April 2013      by: Tom Woods     

I’ve been writing lately about what I call commissars of approved opinion, who can be found on both left and right. On the left, I recently profiled the hapless Ian Millhiser, who hops around the Internet trying to stop people from promoting views to which he and his friends haven’t given the official Stamp of Establishment Approval.

Then there’s neocon Jamie Weinstein of the Daily Caller, who tries to destroy Eric Margolis — Eric Margolis! — by falsely calling him a 9/11 truther, and demonizes Walter Block for holding opinions on secession that the old National Review even allowed to be aired in its pages. (I link to Weinstein in Neocons Attack Ron Paul Peace Institute and in Daily Caller Says I Am Missing All Their Deep Points.)

Ludwig von Mises himself believed resolutely in secession. Mises, too, used to appear in National Review. Today, the twentysomethings who run the conservative intellectual movement — an oxymoron if there ever was one — have never heard of Mises.

Weinstein makes sure the Establishment understands that these people are cranks for not sharing 80% of the political presuppositions of Bill Clinton, as Weinstein’s friends (and presumably all other respectables) all do, and that he himself is one of the Reasonable People who may pretend to nibble around the edges of the state, but who, when the Establishment raises its flag, can always be counted on to salute.

Oh, and remember: for Jamie Weinstein it is absolutely not crankish to have run around telling everyone that Saddam Hussein had an unmanned drone program that was going to kill Englishmen within 45 minutes. We are never, ever to use the word crank to refer to Tony Blair or any of the neocons who weaved apologias for him.

It is, furthermore, positively not crankish to have cheered for the stupidest war in American history, based on propaganda that would have insulted a fourth-grader, and which resulted in at least 100,000 and perhaps as many as 1 million deaths, 2-4 million people displaced, an ancient Christian community destroyed, an Islamic constitution written for Iraq, and the strengthening of the very Iranian regime we’re supposed to blow more resources on destroying now.

Nothing crankish about that. How could it be, after all, if Tim Russert favored it?

Finally, there’s poor Jamie Kirchick, who makes fun of Ron Paul by calling his followers “isolationists” — so, like a good neocon, he adopts the left’s smear term against his opponents — and “goldbugs.” He thinks the gold standard is so stupid and contemptible that he once again uses the left’s smear term against — well, against the most free-market economists of the twentieth century. So Henry Hazlitt was a “goldbug” to be ignored? Henry Hazlitt, author of the classic Economics in One Lesson, must be dropped forthwith? To be in good stead with the wise and learned Jamie Kirchick requires quite a sacrifice indeed!

So Kirchick adopts the monetary policy of the left, and of all authoritarians and totalitarians throughout history. (Although, of course, if you are not interested in fattening the American warfare state by rushing to war with Ruritania, it is you who, in Kirchick’s infelicitous phrase, are a “dictator-lover.” Physician, heal thyself.) He is a “conservative.” He supported Rudy Giuliani for president.

Again we have someone who is dying to let everyone know that he holds all the approved opinions, and that he has never soiled his pristine mind with thoughts that were not pre-screened by the Wall Street Journal and the Washington Post. The endorsement of Giuliani was really the icing on the cake. As if we needed more proof that Kirchick was basically satisfied with how things are going, and would perhaps like to see things be about 1.2% different.

I am considering having a regular department here in which I go after a “Commissar of the Week.” Part of me is concerned about giving them attention they don’t deserve. But the other part thinks this is an important phenomenon to study, understand, and explain to others. What do you all think?

Unlearn the Propaganda!

  • lastoftheromans .

    Where a lot of what this movement talks about is rather dry, and sometimes downright depressing, a humorous(as only you can Tom) view at the mainstream thought could be a good way to bring new people into the movement. As Dickens said, there is nothing as infectious as laughter.

  • Anonymous

    Alles klar, Herr Kommissar?

  • http://twitter.com/QuantumBios JC

    Do it! Commissar of the Week! More people will start to ignore these subversives once they’re exposed.

  • Anonymous

    Thank you Tom for all you do! Keep it up I have been awake for years thanks to people like you and Ron Paul. I hope the fire of freedom burns deep in every American soon to awake them to the awful reality that neocons and a tyrannical government has done to this beautiful country.

  • http://twitter.com/ScottBieser Pope Athos V

    The way I see it, these “commissars” almost by definition already have a lot of peoples’ attention. By posting counterpoints to their blatherings, you can expose people, via the search engines, to needed cogent critiques. Please go for it.

  • chris

    Great idea, Tom !
    I think the name: “Commissar of the Week” doesn’t have enough of a bite though. Through the growth of our .gov, “commissar” has become too innocuously sounding, like “commissioner.” Someone suggested “Commissar Taxonomy;” how about “Commissar Taxidermy” ?
    Personally, I prefer something with a little more sting to it: “… 5th columnists,” “… propaganda ministry,” …

  • jp

    Saw Ray’s comment below. Don’t know should be the next neocon target. Kincaid or the “former” Marxist Horowitz.

  • Anonymous

    If you’ve got the time to write it up, then I have the time to read it.

  • Anonymous

    Easy there, Falco.

  • D A

    Kirchick’s “some guy”-level fame is built on intellectual fraud. His “fifth column” smear of Scheuer is a Kirchick standard. Reality Inversion 101.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jared-Baker/100002140541294 Jared Baker

    Tom, i wish you would do more of explaining history and making SOUND arguments against articles of the “Official APPROVED Opinion”

  • Bill Jones

    I think pissing all over one of these clowns on a regular basis would be a fine thing.
    The good news is that there is no shortage of showeree’s

    Keeping the bladder adequately supplied might be an issue.

  • Anonymous

    “She said, “Babe you know, I miss Jill and Joe”And all my funky friendsBut my street understandingWas just enough to know what she really meant”

  • Terrapin Station

    Let them have it Dr Woods. Your ‘kicking ass and taking names posts’ are like watching Hulk hogan wrestle Gumby.

Find me on Google